Of all Jordan’s 2008 Lingan Open performance, the majority account is most firm in the course that her final words took in this final push toward victory; in fact, so inarguably impactful were the words in question that a few direct quotes can, with reasonable assurance, be included.
What we are told is that, before continuing, Jordan allowed to pass a long, pregnant pause, and in that space of time, she appeared to evaluate her surroundings and find them adequate; accordingly, she began her actual argument, which was that mass extremism, in all its forms, is unamerican. The country, she stressed, has no room for those who would push others out, and neither is there room for those who desire to drag others along; further, this prohibition applies to those who would do their pushing or dragging for what they term good ends, even democratic ones. Extremists, the Acme Academy superstar argued, no matter their kind, are a bad type, and all of what they both point out and point toward should be held apart from oneself and evaluated with a skeptical eye.
“Death to extremism,” Jordan famously uttered, and we are assured that her words were as impactful as they seem. “No word is saving, be it democracy or salvation itself, and to love any assemblage of letters, such as d-e-m-o-c-r-a-c-y, is just as bad as to hate it. There exists no password to liberty, no secret for security, and let us, in our focus, not forget the genius-Founder’s haunting reminder against giving up the former in order to secure the latter.”
Jordan continued with the argument that extremism, by its very nature, leads to massing, which itself, of course, inevitably leads to huddling, and a huddled mass is thus, by degrees, able to be formed out of a group of individuals. To huddle in mass before the idol of democracy is still, she pointed out, to huddle in mass, and a democratically minded mob is still a mob.
Finally, having so spoken against the extremes of democracy, Jordan ended with a slight rebuke of her own extremism against extremism, which did much, of course, to mollify the rebuked. Despite extremism’s many faults, she argued, an extreme anti-extremism merely doubles those errors; for such is, after all, a form of extremism, and it may be that all things, even the most extreme, have their value that a seasoned moderation might bring out. Regarding democracy, Jordan said, remember the prophet-chaplain of Washington, and do not forget that he, with all his powers of foresight, declared himself to be a democrat, though he both well knew and experienced the fact that there is, in practice, nothing more anti-democratic than democratic extremism. The great error, she argued, is in carrying anything too far, be it anything, and thus death, indeed, to extremism, though let it be a slow, drawn-out death that allows any worth in the creed to be extracted.
-from Chapter 3